On commencing this unit, my understandings of the
teacher-librarian (TL) as leader were indistinct and included the notion that
this leadership required vision, communication
and the ability to inspire and enthuse as critical elements (Gillespie,
2013). This view saw TL leadership as
linked to increasing influence across the school to open co-teaching and
curriculum development opportunities.
While some notions remain true, my views of TL as leader has
been significantly challenged and expanded. On concluding the first assessment,
my knowledge of leadership theory developed significantly to appreciate aspects
and qualities of TLs as leaders. In particular, the need and use of a vision
and goals was confirmed as crucial to leadership (Sergiovanni, 2005; Marzano,
Waters & McNulty, 2005).This was extended through the realisation that a
purposeful consensus driven mission or moral purpose is required to engage
followers (Beliese 2005; Zmuda and Harada, 2008). I now appreciate that the
unequal teacher/student relationship (Swaffield and MacBeath, 2009) and
intention to make a difference by increasing
students’ efficacy of information use (Wizenreid, 2010) or improving student outcomes
provide TLs with such purpose. As such,
my comprehension of the relationship between this moral purpose, vision, relationship
building, collaboration and effective leadership has been expanded to include the
recognition that to create collaborative cultures that allow
collegiality to occur spontaneously a cause beyond self is required (Semadeni,
2009).
This course has extended my understanding of the relationship
collaboration and leadership have to effective team building and the importance
of having a message and articulating it in meaningful ways (Orridge, 2009).
This includes realising the need for authenticity
and understanding during the change process (Cameron and Green, 2004) and the
role in which positive relationships and professional support is essential to
leading change (Schifter, 2008; Orridge, 2009). These ideas are encapsulated in the
idea of agency which links both leadership and learning to activities such as
co-teaching, curriculum development and professional development. In this way
collaboration and inquiry can be viewed as organising concepts for classroom
and school leadership (Collay, 2011; Goodnough, 2005).
Through the readings, a greater depth and understanding of
professional development opportunities and methods and its relationship to
leadership has been developed. Velzen, Volman,
Brekelmans & White’s (2011) 3 step plan where
modelling is practical theorising and Semadeni’s the Fusion model (2009) where
mentors demonstrate and
activate leaners’ mirror neurons to foster qualities, attitudes and behaviours
necessary to establish collaborative cultures were particularly enlightening as
methods TLs can employ in leading professional develop.
My understanding of the role professional development can
play in providing leadership across the school has been developed to recognise
that the social nature of learning mean collegiality
and co-collaboration are crucial to professional development (Leiberman and
Pointer-Mace, 2010). Ongoing professional development, trials and
discussions regarding change (Livingstone, 2012; AITSL, 2012) provide
leadership opportunities TLs can utilise to manage and lead change.
These notions contributed to an expanded awareness of leading from the
middle and blend well with newly acquired ideas of leadership as the potential
outcome of interactions between groups of people (Townsend, 2011) where leadership is not synonymous with the
individual at the top (Swaffield and MacBeath, 2009). This resonates with the
idea of teachers as leaders in their own classroom and the concepts of
distributed leadership (Youngs, 2009;
Hargreaves, 2007) and leadership for learning (Townsend, 2011) where spaces and opportunity need to be created
for teacher experts to demonstrate and share their expertise.
Prior to undertaking this unit, I possessed limited knowledge
of change management. This has been significantly extended to include an
understanding of steps in the change process (Lewis, 2011). In addition, I have
developed an appreciation of the relationship between these steps and the
leadership qualities and skills such as problem
solving (Adair, 2100; Shearhouse,2011) data-informed leadership (Knapp,
Copeland and Swinnerton, 2007) and effective team management (Belbin, 2010,
Aguilar, n.d) required to effect change. Likewise, my understanding
of the combination of attributes and range of actions required for TLS to
successfully lead and undertake strategic planning that is collaborative and
responsive to community needs (Nelson, 2008; Allison and Kaye,2005) has been significantly developed.
School leadership is complex and
fluid, requiring changes in approaches, styles and techniques dependent on
goals and situations. I now appreciate that TL leadership is not one role,
skill or action, nor it is the employing of one particular leadership theory or
communication method, it is the collective actions and strategies employed to
collaborate, advocate, educate and innovate to make the library integral to all
learning and teaching in the school.
REFERENCES
Aguilar, E. (n.d.).
Effective Teams: The Key to Transforming Schools? Edutopia. K-12
Education & Learning Innovations with Proven Strategies that Work. Retrieved
March 28, 2013, from
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/teacher-teams-transform-schools-elena-aguilar
Belbin, R. M. (2010).
Chapter 9. The art of building a team. Team
roles at work (2nd ed., pp. 97-106). Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann. Retrieved
march 28 from Charles
Sturt University
website
http://www.csuau.eblib.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=535053
Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable
Leadership and Development in Education: creating the future, conserving the
past.. European Journal of
Education, 42(2),
223-233. Retrieved January 24, 2013, from
http://www.internationalfuturesforum.com/iffblog_old/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/hargreaves-eje-past-present-and-future.pdf
Lieberman, A and Pointer-Mace, D (2010) Making Practice
Public: Teacher Learning in the 21st Century. Journal of Teacher Education 2010, 61(77) DOI:
10.1177/0022487109347319
Livingston, K. (2012): Approaches to professional
development of teachers in Scotland: pedagogical innovation or financial
necessity?, Educational Research, 54(2),
161-172 Doi:10.1080/00131881.2012.680041
Schifter, C. (2008). Effecting Change
in the Classroom Through Professional Development. In C. Schifter (Ed.), Infusing
Technology into the Classroom: Continuous Practice Improvement (pp.
259-274). Hershey, PA: . doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-765-2.ch014
Sergiovanni, T. (2005). The
Virtues of Leadership. The
Educational Forum, 69(Winter),
112-123. Retrieved March16, 2013, from
http://www.scribd.com/doc/7375166/Sergiovanni-Thomas-Virtues-of-Leadership
Swafford, S & MacBeath, J.
(2009) Leadership for learning. In
MacBeath, J. E., & Dempster, N. (Eds.)(2009). Connecting leadership and learning: principles for practice (pp. 32-52). London: Routledge. Retrieved
May 2, 2013 from Charles Sturt University website http://www.csuau.eblib.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=355852&echo=1&userid=75%2bPOA257%2f1ZaNWG7TLUwA%3d%3d&tstamp=1360490936&id=087020FA33867E19826CBD9075923A9F82493CAA
Townsend,
T. (2011). School leadership in the twenty-first century: different approaches
to common problems? School
Leadership and Management, 31(2),
93-103. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from Charles Sturt University website
http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/13632434.2011.572419
Velzen, C.,
Volman, M., Brekelmans, M., & White, S. (2011). Guided work-based learning: Sharing practical teaching knowledge with
student teachers. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 28(2),
229-239. Retrieved May 9, 2013, from http://www.citeulike.org/article/9948660
Wizenreid,
A. (2010). Visionary leaders for
information. Centre for information studies, Charles Sturt University:
Wagga Wagga
Youngs,
H. (2009). (Un)Critical times? Situating distributed leadership in the field . Journal of Educational
Administration and History, 41(4),
377-389. Retrieved March 24, 2013, from Charles Sturt University website
http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1080/00220620903211588